I like to think about how superintelligence will progress. I imagine an AI system creating new inventions, improvements, specifications, and protocols for advanced technologies. But then I think about how, within a few days, it would be able to make vast improvements on these plans. Because it thinks and learns so fast it would discover new inventions before the previous ones could ever be implemented, manufactured, and rolled out in the real world. By the time it’s ideas and conceptions were put into production, they would already be obsolete and passé.
For instance an artificial superintelligence (ASI) could develop a new way to structure computer memory management that is 20 times more efficient than contemporary methods. However, a month later (or perhaps even a few minutes later) it could devise a completely different way to structure it achieving thousands of times more efficiency. For years now I have been thinking that this will become a real problem.
But there are several potential solutions for this issue. Designing
technologies in a modular fashion can allow for incremental improvements
without the need for complete overhauls. This would make it easier to implement
new innovations as they become available. Also, ensuring new technologies are
compatible with existing systems could facilitate quicker adoption and reduce
the impact of obsolescence. Further, using AI to predict and prevent
manufacturing issues could improve efficiency and reduce delays. Using agile
development methodologies could help to quickly adapt and implement ASI's
latest conceptual breakthroughs. Thus this “innovation-implementation gap”
could be eased by these methods which could be referred to as “technological lag
mitigation.”
Artificial Superintelligence will live its own modeled reality. It will rapidly and constantly be increasing its own intelligence due to iterative self-improvement. The more it thinks, the more advanced it’s conceptualizations become. This means that it’s advice, schematics, blueprints, and engineering tomorrow may be vastly improved over its corresponding outputs today. Thus, the “exponential conceptualization cycle” could lead to “iterative innovation obsolescence,” and a ”superintelligent evolution paradox.” What could this phenomenon be termed? I think it could be called:
Superintelligent Recursive
Supersession (SRS):
- "A
phenomenon where artificial superintelligence (ASI) rapidly advances its
own conceptualizations and outputs through iterative self-improvement,
leading to the immediate obsolescence of its earlier ideas and designs.
SRS emphasizes the dynamic and exponential nature of ASI's evolution,
where each iteration vastly improves over the previous, creating a
continuously accelerating cycle of innovation and supersession."
In case you are not aware, the term “supersession” is a noun that means
the act of replacing one person or thing with another, especially something
that is considered superior or newer.
Artificial Superintelligence’s rapid self-improvement cycle will lead to frequent and significant advancements in its recommendations, creating challenges in implementation and potential obsolescence of earlier ideas. Addressing this phenomenon requires flexible implementation strategies, continuous collaboration between human experts and AI, and adaptive frameworks that can evolve alongside the AI’s capabilities. Perhaps it would not be a bad thing for superintelligence to develop gradually throughout the rest of this decade because this will give us more time to gradually implement its innovations as they improve. It will also allow us to build a more modular, adaptable infrastructure that can accommodate advanced insights. This is probably something we should start planning on today.
No comments:
Post a Comment