Jared
Edward Reser Ph.D.
jared@jaredreser.com
www.aithought.com
Abstract
The potential emergence of
superintelligence presents significant challenges in ensuring alignment with
human values and intentions. One critical concern is the inherent opacity of artificial
neural networks, which obscures their decision-making processes. This paper
proposes a novel approach to safety and transparency by requiring an AI system
to generate sensory images that reliably reveal its internal states. If imagery
generation was made a fundamental and unalterable aspect of its cognitive cycle,
as it is in the human brain, the resulting system would be unable to hide its plans
or intentions. Such an AI system would use the current contents of its
attention or working memory to prompt advanced generative models to continuously
produce visual (mental imagery) and language (internal monologue)
representations of its processing (inner thought). These representations could
be time-stamped, stored, and made accessible through an interactive interface,
enabling real-time monitoring and retrospective analysis. The feasibility of
this approach is supported by existing machine learning technologies, including
multimodal networks, large language models, and image generation models. By capturing
the prominent internal representations at each time step and organizing them
into composite images, this method could facilitate the detection and
correction of hostile motives and the reinforcement of desirable objectives,
enhancing trust and accountability. The technical implementation, as well as
the potential benefits and challenges of this approach are discussed. It is
concluded that the approach provides a practical and scalable solution for AI
alignment that can be divided into two forms, here termed generative
explainability and generative interpretability.
Keywords
artificial general intelligence, attention,
consciousness, focus of attention, AI safety, AI interpretability, AI
alignment, superintelligence, latent space, generative AI, working memory,
ethics in AI, machine learning, neural networks, generative models, autonomous
systems
1.0
Introduction
The rapid advancement of artificial
intelligence (AI) systems has intensified concerns about AI safety and
alignment, particularly as we approach the possibility of artificial general
intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI). This paper proposes
addressing these concerns by implementing a form of multimodal transparency
within advanced AI systems. This method, here termed "generative interpretability,"
requires AI systems to automatically generate and log internal imagery and
textual representations that depict their hidden states as an automatic part of
their cognitive cycle. This method was
introduced in previous writings (Reser, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2016, 2019, 2022),
but it is given a full treatment here.
This approach draws inspiration from
the human brain, where visual and other sensory areas of the cerebral cortex
continuously generate depictions of the contents of attention and working
memory. By leveraging state-of-the-art imagery generation and language models,
advanced AI systems could produce reliable visual and textual representations
of their "hidden" neural network states. These representations would
be logged, stored, and made available for viewing through a dedicated user
interface. This continuous visualization would allow humans and other AIs to
audit the system, permitting real-time monitoring and post-hoc analysis.
Fig. 1. Schematic of the present method for
visualizing and inspecting an AI’s hidden states and processes.
The ongoing visual narrative history
this process would create could be used as an auditing tool to ensure the AI
remains aligned with ethical norms and does not deviate toward unintended,
dangerous, or harmful behavior. The method would enable human operators to
meaningfully correct or suspend the system either in real-time or
retrospectively. It would also enable the provision of training feedback. Creating
a system that can be barred, interrupted, or steered away from unsafe internal
states, could significantly reduce the risk of an AI system planning or
elaborating on potentially harmful actions without human knowledge.
To ensure that this technique cannot be
finessed or circumvented, the generation of imagery maps must be necessary for
a cognitive cycle. The system must be inherently obligated to create pictures
and text to initiate and inform the next stage of processing. Thus, to keep
thinking and reasoning, the system must build mental imagery each time its
attention is updated, just as in the brain.
The following sections will review
related work in AI transparency and interpretability, describe the
implementation of the proposed method at a high level, and discuss the user
interface for interacting with the generated data. They will also explore the
feasibility of this approach, identify potential challenges, and highlight the
benefits and broader implications for AI safety and alignment.
Literature Review
1.2
The Black Box Problem
Recent years have seen the development
of increasingly sophisticated systems that rival human intelligence in specific
domains. As we approach the potential development of AGI, ensuring these
systems align with human values and intentions becomes paramount. The alignment
problem is particularly challenging due to the inherent opacity of neural
networks, which often operate as "black boxes" with decision-making
processes that can be inscrutable to human observers.
The core of this problem lies in the
way neural network models encode knowledge. They utilize patterns distributed across
billions of weights, making it exceptionally difficult to interpret their prediction-making
processes. This complexity renders many traditional AI safety techniques and
procedures inapplicable to neural networks, despite these networks being the
most promising technology for advancing AI capabilities.
The lack of transparency in neural
networks exacerbates concerns about the potential risks of superintelligent AI.
There are fears that such systems could harbor motives misaligned with human
interests or take unforeseen actions detrimental to humanity. This opacity not
only complicates efforts to ensure AI safety but also hinders public trust and
acceptance of AI technologies in critical domains. While there are several limited
methods currently in use and promising theoretical approaches on the horizon for
addressing the black box problem, a comprehensive solution remains elusive.
1.3 Current Methods
Aimed at Interpretability
Several approaches
have been proposed to address the transparency of AI systems. Explainable AI
(XAI) encompasses a collection of techniques focused on making machine learning
algorithms trustworthy and understandable (Xu et al., 2019). Presently, the
techniques use quantitative and statistical methods to trace the weights and
uncover the activations most responsible for the system’s output. Within XAI,
there are ongoing efforts to create inherently interpretable models by schematizing
attention mechanisms, attributing outputs to particular features, and using
simpler surrogate models to approximate complex ones. XAI techniques have helped users
debug, improve, and find biases in their models.
Relatedly,
researchers in the field of mechanistic interpretability have developed methods
to visualize the internal workings of neural networks, such as saliency maps,
which highlight important features in the input data (Bereska & Gavves,
2024). They also use activation maximization, which can generate interpretable
patterns by strongly activating specific neurons or layers, as well as feature
visualization techniques that reveal what parts of a network are detecting
specific features. Safety
engineering professionals have expressed concerns that modern techniques may
not prove sufficient to control more sophisticated learning systems (Hassan et
al., 2022). The limitations of current methods highlight the need for new
approaches that can provide more comprehensive insights into AI behavior.
These techniques have
made significant strides in advancing our understanding of how AI systems work.
However, they have no capacity to provide a continuous, real-time overview of
an AI system's internal states. The present solution offers a more comprehensive
form of explainability. Generated imagery offers a wholistic and immersive view
of an AI’s internal behavior, providing deeper insights into how decisions are
made. Composite images offer clear advantages over existing methods such as
heat maps and saliency maps which simply highlight which parts of the input
data were important for a model's decision. This is because pictures are intuitive,
comprehensible, and easier to interpret. The pictures could also force a
deceptive AI, whose outputs cannot be trusted, to explicitly report on its network
activation patterns (eliciting latent knowledge). This inspires two novel
conceptual approaches which are defined in Table 1 below.
Term
|
Definition
|
Generative
Interpretability
|
The field of AI
research focused on using generative techniques to create pictorial representations
of the processes of an AI system, allowing them to be interpreted by humans.
|
Generative
Explainability
|
The field of AI
research that uses generative models to illustrate the workings of AI systems
in ways that are relatable and understandable to the user and that allows the
user to retain intellectual oversight.
|
Table 1. Definition of Key Terms
Two terms introduced here to describe
how generative AI can impact AI safety research.
How should imagery
generation be integrated with an AI system? The present approach derives
insights from mammalian neuroscience. The mammal visual system and its ability
to generate sensory maps could provide helpful groundwork in designing AI compatible
with generative interpretability.
Proposed Method
2.0 The Mammalian
Brain Generates Imagery Depicting the Focus of Attention
Sensory areas of the vertebrate brain continually create mappings
of the sensed world. For example, visual areas create neural representations of
the visual field that have a one-to-one correspondence with the photoreceptive
cells in the retina. In mammals, cortical sensory areas (such as the visual
cortex) also build maps of the focus of cognition. When this occurs, the
disparate contents held in working memory or attention (maintained in
association areas) are broadcast backwards to sensory areas where they are
integrated into a composite mapping.
In humans there are dozens of sensory areas, each building
their own instances of internal imagery simultaneously. Visual, auditory,
haptic, motor and many other maps are built to depict whatever our mind turns
to. These internal representations are referred to as topographic maps because
they retain a physical correspondence to the geometric arrangement of the
sensory organ (i.e. retinotopic maps corresponds to the retina). There are also
multimodal areas that build more abstract mappings. For instance, language
areas (i.e. Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas) build a verbal narrative that
reflects the contents of working memory and the progression of thoughts.
Fig. 2. Schematic of the
human imagery generation system.
The items or concepts currently within attention (C, D, E,
and F) are used as parameters to drive the generation of language in cortical
language areas and imagery in visual cortex.
If I were to ask you to think of a pink hippopotamus riding
a unicycle, you could visualize this in your mind’s eye by creating a mapping
of it in your early visual cortex. Research has shown these, previously
private, internal maps can be read by brain imaging techniques. Not
surprisingly, artificial neural networks are utilized to decode and reconstruct
the brain imaging data into pictures. Recent methods have proven effective in displaying
activity patterns from the visual cortex onto a screen so that the content of a
person’s thoughts or dreams can be coarsely displayed for others to view. This
is known as fMRI-to-image (Benchetrit et al., 2023).
Imagine that you are locked in a room with a stranger and
the only thing in the room is a sharp knife. Complete access to the mental imagery
the stranger forms in their brain, along with all their subvocal speech, would
give you near certainty about everything from their plans to their impulses. You
could use that data to know if you were safe or not and the other person would
not be able to hide their intentions. If humanity had a form of fMRI-to-image
for AI systems, then the AI would similarly be unable to hide its intentions.
In humans, fMRI-to-image is still in its early stages. This
is not so with computers. As of 2024, the digital neural network equivalent is
a well-developed technology. Today, consumers readily generate images from
simple prompts in a process known as “text-to-image,” “image synthesis,” or
“neural rendering.” Presently, using diffusion models (iterative denoising) the
images generated have reached the quality of real photographs and human drawn
art. Most popular text-to-image models combine a language model, which
transforms the input text into a latent representation, with a generative image
model which has been trained on image and text data to produce an image
conditioned on that latent representation. Essentially, existing technology
makes a proof-of-concept design for the present technique feasible. Before discussing how this could be implemented, the next
section will discuss an additional reason why imagery generation would be a
beneficial addition to an AI’s cognitive cycle.
2.1 Generative Imagery
Can Also Be Used by the Model to Improve Prediction
In previous articles (Reser, 2016, 2022b) I describe a
cognitive architecture for a superintelligent AI system implementing my model
of working memory (Reser, 2011). In this work, I explain that human thought is
propagated by a constant back and forth interaction between association areas
(prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex) that hold the contents of
attention, and sensory areas (visual and auditory cortex) that build maps of those
attentional contents. These interactions are key to the progression of reasoning.
This is partly because each map introduces new informational content for the
next iterative cycle of working memory.
Fig. 3. The Iterative Cycle
of Imagery Generation and Attentional Updating
Sensory areas create topographic maps of the contents of
attention. Then, salient or informative aspects of these maps are used update
the contents of attention. This creates an iterative cycle of reciprocal
interactions that support reasoning and world modeling.
For most people, visualizing something
in the mind’s eye provides further information about it, helping to introduce
new topics to the stream of thought. Emulating human cognitive processes, such
as mental imagery and internal monologues, may also help AI develop more robust
and relatable reasoning pathways and improve its ability to simulate reality
(Reser, 2016). For example, the AI system could send the images it generates to
an image recognition system (e.g., a pre-trained convolutional neural network) which
could be used to perform scene understanding and identify the concepts
incidental to the image. The textual description generated from this analysis could
then be fed back into the primary model’s attention to provide it with the
metric, compositional, and associative information inherent in images.
The incidental concepts that emerge
from generated imagery can stimulate new associations much like a person having
an “aha” moment when visualizing a problem. Thus, the visual synthesis is not
merely a reflection of the original items or tokens, but a source of new useful
insights. The generation of internal scenery and monologues might also be a
step toward machine consciousness or self-awareness. While this is a
speculative topic, an AI that can "see" and "hear" its own
thought processes, could blur the lines between machine cognition and
human-like thinking and could be used to study the emergence of complex thought
patterns. This technique could be valuable for all these reasons, while also
allowing for generative interpretability.
2.2 Interpretable
Imagery Generation for Contemporary Models
Implementing generative interpretability into contemporary
state-of-the-art models like transformer-based models involves creating a
system where the AI not only processes input data but also generates multimodal
representations of its internal cognitive processes. One approach is to have a
parallel generative network that runs alongside the primary model. This network
could be designed to take intermediate representations (e.g., hidden states or
attention weights) from the main model and transduce them into corresponding topographic
visualizations and textual descriptions. Alternatively, heavily activated
tokens within the model’s vocabulary or attentional window could be directly
linked (through network integration or fusion) to nodes in the separate
generative networks, coupling hidden states between these networks.
Researchers have developed various techniques to visualize
the internal representations of neural networks, particularly in computer
vision tasks. In fact, there are many technologies that make it possible to
take readings from a neural network and use them to formulate a picture or
video. Previously, these technologies included inverse networks, Hopfield
networks, self-organizing maps, Kohonen networks, and others. Today, a variational
autoencoder (VAE), diffusion model, or generative adversarial network (GAN)
could be the best systems for creating interpretable images. These would
translate the AI’s global processing steps into explicit pictures, generating a
continuous episodic chronology that depicts its impulses, decisions, and
rationales. If adequately visualized, the AI could become an open book and
anything it tries to plan would be as clear as day.
Other modalities could include an auditory
sense (for predicting accompanying sounds), somatosensory (for predicting
touch), as well as smell, taste, vestibular, proprioceptive, and other senses.
If a motor modality was included for predicting the next action, the AI would,
in effect, be simulating an embodied world which could also help to ground the
model. Multimodularity could lend informative and mutually corroborating detail
to the AI’s generated narrative that humans could watch, read, and hear.
The human visual cortex samples from working memory and
creates imagery every few brain wave cycles. But this may be too frequent for a
computer. Forcing a present-day language model to generate an image for every
new token that enters its attentional window would be prohibitively
computationally expensive. However, there would be many other ways to do this
such as creating an image for every sentence or creating images of text
summarizations for paragraphs. Text-to-image models today can generate multiple
low-resolution images every second. Because most LLM’s generate text on the
order of sentences or paragraphs per second, these technologies are very
compatible in terms of their production rate. This compatibility could make for seamless integration and
synchronization, where the AI generates text while simultaneously producing
visual imagery to match.
The images generated in human visual cortex use parameters
from working memory which has a capacity-limited span of around 4 to 7 items.
This number may be optimal in many ways to specify a composition describing an
event or circumstance. On the other hand, there can be thousands of tokens
within the context window and attention span of modern large language models.
This may be too many to generate a single coherent image. Thus, imagery made
from latent representations would have to be made from a small subset of the most
active or highest weighted contents.
Present-day language models are not dangerous, autonomous
agents that need to be supervised. Also, their language output can already be
taken as a reliable signal of their internal states. That is why moving
forward, this article will focus on adapting this approach to more advanced
future systems, particularly my cognitive architecture for superintelligence
(Reser, 2022a). In this paradigm, the parameters for imagery and language
generation are not derived from the textual output of an LLM, but rather from
the hidden layers of a larger brain-inspired neural network.
2.3 Interpretable
Imagery Generation for Future Models
In future cognitive computing systems,
generative imagery could be derived, not from tokens, but from items held in the
system’s working memory or global workspace. These items would be high-level
abstract representations. Reser’s Iterative Updating model of working memory
(2022a) explains how these items could be formed from artificial neurons and
how they could be manipulated as symbols over time through partial updating of
active neural states. As items in the system’s working memory are updated
iteratively, this process creates a gradual and overlapping transition between
mental states, allowing for mental continuity, context-sensitive predictions,
and incremental associative searches across memory.
The iterative updating model of working
memory posits that mental states are not completely replaced from one moment to
the next. Instead, new information is gradually integrated into the current
state, while portions of the previous state are retained (i.e. changing from
concepts A, B, C, & D to B, C, D, & E). This partial updating creates
subsequent states that overlap, which can explain how mental imagery from one
moment to the next would be similar and share pictorial characteristics. Thus,
we can expect the images coming from such as system to be interrelated, forming
a succession of incidents that could construct a story or plot.
The machine must be capable of
producing a visual representation of its internal processing units. These could
be symbolic or subsymbolic and include things like items of attention,
reasoning paths, or latent representations. These hidden processing states
could be found in the attention weights or matrices, subgraph circuits, neuron
or layer activation patterns, embeddings or vectors representing high-level
features. This data may have to be extracted, properly mapped, and then labeled
for supervised learning so that the generative model can be trained to produce
images from these high-dimensional internal representations.
An advanced AI implementation would
feature multiple interfacing artificial networks arranged in an architecture
similar to the mammalian neocortex with unimodal sensory modules (i.e. auditory
and visual) at the bottom of the hierarchy. Like the human brain it would
utilize both bottom-up and top-down processing pathways. For instance, the
top-down pathway would stretch from attention to imagery generation. For a
bottom-up pass, the images generated could be sent to an image recognition
module (image-to-text) so that any new information held in the image can be
included in the next attentional set (as discussed in Section 2.1). This
creates a feedback loop where the outputs from the generative interpretability
layer are fed back into the primary model.
As seen in Figure 3, each image should
also be delivered to an image-to-video system that takes the current image and
provides a series of output images to predict what will happen next. The
predictive frames generated by this system could additionally be sent for image
recognition. Thus, if attention holds concepts related to a knife attack, the
system will paint a picture of what this attack could look like, and then
animate that picture to generate an action sequence. Not only could this action
sequence inform attention, but its final frame could be used as the initial
frame of the next action sequence in the subsequent time step. Splicing
individual predictive video snippets in this way could create a feed of imagery
approximating an imagination.
Fig. 4. Schematic of the present method for
visualizing an AI’s attentional set and creating a synthetic imagination
At each time step the contents of attention are transcribed
into text, expanding them into a narrative meant to approximate an internal
monologue. This text is then used in three ways. 1) The text is summarized or
reflected upon, and the major outstanding conceptual components are used as
candidates for the next state of attention. 2) The text is used to prompt an
image which is then viewed by an image recognition classifier (image-to-text)
to describe new aspects of the image for possible inclusion in the next state
of attention. 3) The image is also animated into a video which makes
predictions about what would be expected in the next frames. These frames are
then sent to the image-to-text classifier to search for possible inclusions for
attention, as well as integrated with the imagery frames in the next cycle to
create a form of synthetic imagination.
Advanced models like GAN-based video generators or
transformer-based video prediction models could be employed to generate smooth
transitions between frames, effectively turning static images into animated
sequences, automating an imaginative faculty. The image-to-video AI system
would need to be trained on video sequences of naturally evolving physical,
biological, and behavioral phenomena to ensure the model learns how to predict
plausible next frames, and an apt intuition for technical and scientific work.
As discussed, visual processing in the human brain is not
purely feedforward; there are recurrent and feedback loops that allow for
refining and re-evaluating visual information. Such recursive processes could
be crucial for resolving ambiguity and enhancing detail in an AI’s mental
imagery. Thus, the synthetic imagination
schematized in Figure 3 could help support an advanced form of visual working
memory or something analogous to the human visuospatial sketchpad. Moreover, it
could be enriched by multiple senses, and benefit further from cross-modal,
multisensory integration.
3.0 Monitoring and
Analysis
In an implementation of the proposed
model, visual and auditory streams may proceed at high speeds and produce
copious data. However, these processes can be recorded onto external memory
drives for later review. Handling these extensive records would likely require
the use of databases or cloud storage solutions optimized for large-scale
multimedia data. The recordings could be distributed among a team of observers,
each responsible for analyzing specific sections or aspects of the imagery. By
scrutinizing these outputs, the observers would assess whether the AI’s
intentions exhibit signs of malevolence or deviate from its programmed objectives.
Upon detecting a safety violation, the
system would either halt processing or shift into a safe mode, providing a
critical window for safety checks and countermeasures. Faults would be
systematically detected, isolated, diagnosed, and addressed, ensuring timely
corrective actions to prevent escalation.
If the AI's mental imagery is transmitted to a monitor,
human observers could directly view the content of its “inner eye." This
visual output could be complemented by a synchronized display of the AI’s
internal voice or "inner monologue," presented as a scrolling text
transcript. Both visual and textual data would be captured, time-stamped, and
stored in a structured format, allowing for chronological tracing.
An interactive dashboard would
facilitate efficient navigation through this data. By providing a graphical
timeline interface users could scrub through the AI’s processing history. Users
should also be able to pause and examine specific moments, zoom in, and use
playback speed control. Additional features could allow users to search for
specific events and filter imagery types, facilitating more focused analyses.
Key moments—such as important decisions, anomalies, or noteworthy events—could
be highlighted along the timeline for quick accessibility and review. Users
would also have the ability to annotate specific segments with comments,
enabling collaborative review and discussion.
In addition to human review, a separate
AI system could be employed to scan the feed for contentious elements,
automatically identifying and flagging potentially suspicious or hostile
activity. Such automated scanning could function as an early detection system,
alerting human supervisors to possible threats and allowing for prompt
intervention. Annotation could also be further streamlined by automation, with
machine learning tools generating summaries of lengthy monologues or complex
visual sequences. These summaries would provide high-level overviews, allowing
for rapid comprehension.
This interface could be made accessible
to human experts for technical oversight, or publicly available to individuals
on the web for crowd monitoring and annotation. We could expect that if this
technique provided a coherent and user-friendly explanation, in plain English
with pictorial representations, this would be accessible to experts and
non-experts alike. This expectation seems especially legitimate given the
truisms that visuals are universally understandable and that a picture is worth
a thousand words.
4.0
Benefits and Opportunities:
This
generative approach could help in the development of "friendly AI" if
researchers use reinforcement learning to reward genial and peaceable imagery.
Instead of rewarding an AI's outward behavior, we could reinforce its internal
impulses to bring them in line with our own objectives. Techniques such as
reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) (typically used for complex,
ill-defined, or difficult to specify tasks) could be applied to generative
outputs to steer learning and align the machine's utility function. An AI could
also be used to provide this feedback (RLAIF). Much as with a human child,
compassionate, empathic, prosocial, and benevolent cognitions could be rewarded
using corrections, ratings, or preferences to fine-tune the target model.
Being
able to visualize how networks arrive at particular decisions could aid in
debugging and performance optimization, leading to more effective models and
understanding of AI behavior. Visual records can highlight where in the
processing chain errors occur, making it easier for engineers to localize and
address issues. This could help in healthcare, regulatory compliance, defense,
ethical governance, and other domains where decision transparency is important
or legally required.
Generative
interpretability could serve as a powerful tool for assessing an AI system's
adherence to moral norms and ethical guidelines. Testing the model and then
comparing visual records against expected processing could reveal whether the
Al's actions align with human values and goals. By examining the pertinent
section of an AI's image history, we could gain insights into how it weighs
different ethical considerations and whether it consistently applies moral
principles across various scenarios. Ensuring that the AI doesn't
systematically favor some ideological stances over others could help support
viewpoint pluralism.
Generative
interpretability has significant potential to promote equity and fairness in AI
systems. The approach could reveal subtle biases or discriminatory tendencies
that might otherwise remain hidden (Dwork et al., 2012; Kusner et al., 2017).
For instance, visual evidence could be analyzed to detect patterns that
indicate unfair treatment based on protected characteristics such as age,
gender, or race. This transparency would allow researchers and ethicists to
identify and mitigate algorithmic biases more effectively, ensuring that AI
decision-making aligns with principles of fairness, cultural sensitivity, and
non-discrimination.
Generative
interpretability could significantly enhance cybersecurity measures for AI
systems. Much like how current network security practices employ real-time
automated monitoring into network flow to intercept malicious attacks, this
technique could offer a similar layer of protection. By providing a visual and
auditory trail of an AI's cognitive processes, it could provide crucial
evidence for forensic analysis as well as uncover adversarial attacks
attempting to poison or bias the system. It could also enable early detection
of external manipulation or the presence of malicious code. By integrating
generative interpretability into AI security protocols, we could create a more
transparent and secure ecosystem for advanced AI, significantly mitigating the
risks associated with their deployment in sensitive environments.
The
method espoused here will create an illustrated log of all the AI’s processing
history which should produce valuable insights. By seeing how concepts and
patterns evolve through imagery, researchers can bypass the complexity of
analyzing raw neural activations, accessing a unique window into the machine’s
cognitive strategies and enabling researchers to test hypotheses about how it
simulates forms of human-like cognition. The AI itself could be given access to
this record for reference and recall, potentially increasing its capacity for memory,
self-supervised learning, and metacognition. Furthermore, not only could other
AIs be trained on this record and learn from aspects of the imagery, but it
could enable multiple AIs to develop a shared framework of imagery and
synthetic imagination. Importantly, this record would take up less memory than
storing all the underlying neuronal activations across multiple layers of the
neural networks. Thus, the imagery would amount to a compressed, high-level
summary of its processing.
The
unique perspective on AI “cognition” offered by generative interpretability
could provide valuable insights into the system's "beliefs" and
overall mental state. Just as human wellbeing can be assessed through thought
patterns and internal narratives, we could potentially evaluate an AI's
"mental health" by analyzing its generated imagery and inner
monologue. This would allow the assessment of any signs of maladaptive behavior
such as irrational decision-making, impulsive responses, obsessive fixation on
destructive goals or a tendency toward aggressive simulations. This process
could also help gauge the AI's emotional regulation in high-stakes
environments, ensuring it maintains ethical and balanced behavior over time. It
could also help identify cognitive distortions (overgeneralization,
catastrophizing, personalization, hopelessness or negative self-talk), logical
inconsistencies (delusional, disorganized, magical, grandiose, or paranoid
thinking), or other issues that might impact the AI's decision-making quality
or ethical behavior.
4.1 Challenges and Considerations:
The proposed method of generative
interpretability is at least partially feasible with current technology.
However, creating meaningful and reliable representations of a state-of-the-art
AI's internal states would require extensive additional high-level research and
development. This is partly because adapting advanced AI architectures to
realize this multimodal approach would necessitate substantial modifications in
neural network design.
Generating hundreds or thousands of
images per minute would be very computationally demanding, potentially
impacting the primary system's efficiency and speed. As AI systems grow in
complexity, the volume of data generated would increase further, presenting
challenges in storage and data management. Several scalability and optimization
issues would need to be addressed to ensure the method remains viable for
advanced AI systems especially as they surpass human-level intelligence.
It is crucial that the AI system cannot
intentionally alter or manipulate its generated maps to deceive human monitors.
To prevent this, the connections between subsystems must be structurally
fundamental and unalterable. Additionally, all cognitive representations
coactive in the AI's working memory must be included in the composite depiction
in its visual and auditory maps. This ensures that the AI cannot generate
thoughts or intentions that are not transduced into these observable forms. By
enforcing this constraint, the sequence of maps would remain consistent with
the AI’s underlying goals, intentions, and motivations. Furthermore, this
approach could potentially mitigate risks like wireheading—where the AI
bypasses intended goals by finding a way to maximize its reward directly—or
incentive hacking, where goals are achieved through unintended or harmful
methods. The unequivocal and straightforward nature of this should lead to
casual users and stakeholders trusting the AI.
A crucial aspect of implementing
generative interpretability would be ensuring that the generated imagery is
comprehensible to human observers. This would require striking a delicate
balance between providing sufficient detail and maintaining overall clarity.
While these representations would undoubtedly be more accessible than raw
neural network data, their accurate interpretation might still pose significant
challenges and require specialized expertise. There's also an inherent risk of
over-interpreting the representations through a human cognitive lens,
potentially leading to misunderstandings or false assumptions about the AI's
internal processes. This anthropomorphizing of AI cognition could result in
overlooking critical aspects of the machine's decision-making.
Ensuring the fidelity and accuracy of
these generated representations - that they truly reflect the AI's internal
states without distortion or omission - would be a critical area of research. As
AI systems become more sophisticated, there's also a potential risk that they
might learn to generate misleading or innocuous representations while still
harboring hidden intentions. This possibility underscores the need for robust
verification mechanisms. Initially, it will be crucial to compare the generated
images to known ground truth data to validate the accuracy of the system’s
visualizations. Moreover, contrasting visual with auditory representations from
the same time periods could allow a supervisor to cross-check representations
of the AI's thought processes across modalities. Ensuring consistency will
increase the reliability of the method.
To address these challenges, it will be
important to subject these systems to verification, validation, and
certification measures that ensure adherence to human norms, laws, and
regulations. It will also be imperative to establish rigorous safety standards
and protocols to ensure well-founded AI with provable safety guarantees. Standardizing
these would likely require collaboration between AI researchers, cognitive
scientists, and domain experts to create a comprehensive framework for
accurately decoding and interpreting AI-generated representations.
5.0
Conclusions
Various researchers have offered compelling speculations
about why sufficiently intelligent AI might become unfriendly or potentially
dangerous to humans. Steve Omohundro has proposed that advanced AI systems will
exhibit basic drives leading to undesired behavior, including resource
acquisition, self-preservation, and continuous self-improvement. Similarly,
Alexander Wissner-Gross has suggested that AIs will be highly motivated to
maximize their future freedom of action, potentially at the expense of human
wants and needs. Eliezer Yudkowsky starkly summarized this concern: "The
AI does not hate you, nor does it love you, but you are made out of atoms which
it can use for something else." Additionally, Ryszard Michalski, a pioneer
of machine learning, emphasized that a machine mind is fundamentally unknowable
and therefore potentially dangerous to humans. If
the technology described above is properly implemented, the machine mind may
not be unknowable or even dangerous.
By
leveraging advanced capabilities in language modeling and image generation, an
AI system could be designed to continuously produce visual and auditory
representations of its attentional contents. This approach could facilitate
early detection of misalignment, potentially harmful intentions, or undesirable
planning. It could also significantly enhance the controllability and
dependability of AI systems by making their decision-making processes fully
auditable. It offers a novel solution to the AI alignment problem by,
metaphorically speaking, having the AI "play with its cards face up on the
table." Insisting on creating superintelligence that produces mental
imagery gives humans a form of telepathy or mind reading. This level of transparency
allows for direct observation, rather than relying solely on inferring its
goals and motivations from its actions.
The
following table lists and defines some of the important concepts in the AI
safety literature. These were previously considered separate concerns, possibly
necessitating their own individualized solutions; however, it is evident that
the present method could be used to address each one.
Term
|
Definition in the Context of AI Safety
|
Authenticity
|
The degree to which an AI system's outputs and behaviors
genuinely reflect its internal processes and training, without deception or
misrepresentation.
|
Explainability
|
The ability to provide clear, understandable explanations
for an AI system's decisions, predictions, or behaviors in
human-comprehensible terms.
|
Fairness
|
The quality of an
AI system to make decisions or predictions without bias against particular
groups or individuals based on protected characteristics.
|
Integrity
|
The consistency and reliability of an AI system's
operations, ensuring that it performs as intended and maintains accuracy and
completeness.
|
Interpretability
|
The degree to which
humans can understand and trace the reasoning behind an AI system's outputs,
often through analysis of its internal workings.
|
Observability
|
The capacity to
monitor and measure an AI system's internal states, processes, and outputs in
real-time or retrospectively.
|
Predictability
|
The extent to which
an AI system's behaviors and outputs can be anticipated or forecasted,
especially in novel or edge case scenarios.
|
Robustness
|
An AI system's
ability to maintain reliable and safe performance across a wide range of
inputs, environments, and potential adversarial attacks.
|
Transparency
|
The openness and
clarity with which an AI system's functioning, limitations, and capabilities
are communicated and made accessible to stakeholders.
|
Trustworthiness
|
The overall
reliability, safety, and ethical soundness of an AI system, encompassing its
technical performance and alignment with human values.
|
Table 2. Fundamental Terms and Definitions in AI Safety
A list of important concepts in AI
safety and a description of each. It is relatively straightforward to see how
the present technique could promote each of the concepts listed here.
Hopefully, this work will inspire
further research and innovation in AI safety, especially as we move toward
autonomous systems and superintelligence. Future work should focus on
early-stage prototypes, refining the technical aspects of the approach, addressing
ethical and privacy concerns, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to
address the complex challenges of AI alignment. We should start doing this now
to understand it, improve it, and build it into state-of-the-art systems.
By making AI's internal processes
explicit and understandable, we can mitigate the existential risks associated
with advanced AI and ensure that these systems act in ways that are beneficial
to humanity. This should increase public trust, reduce unnecessary oversight,
and provide for the safe and rapid deployment of new models and technologies.
References
Reser, J. 2022. A Cognitive
Architecture for Machine Consciousness and Artificial Superintelligence:
Updating Working Memory Iteratively, arXiv:2203.17255 [q-bio.NC]
Reser, J. (2019, May 22). Solving
the AI control problem: Transmit its thoughts to a TV. Observed Impulse. http://www.observedimpulse.com/2019/05/solving-ai-control-problem-transmit-its.html?m=1
Reser, J. E. (2022).
Artificial intelligence software structured to simulate human working memory,
mental imagery, and mental continuity. arXiv:2204.05138
Reser, J. 2012.
Assessing the psychological correlates of belief strength: Contributing factors
and role in behavior. 290 pages. UMI Proquest. 3513834.
Reser, J. 2011. What
Determines Belief? The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Belief
Formation and Change. Verlag Dr. Müller. 236 pages. ISBN: 978-3-639-35331-0.
Reser, J. E. (2013).
The neurological process responsible for mental continuity: Reciprocating
transformations between a working memory updating function and an imagery
generation system. Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness
Conference. San Diego CA, July 12-15.
Reser, J. E. (2016).
Incremental change in the set of coactive cortical assemblies enables mental
continuity. Physiology and Behavior, 167(1), 222-237.
Benchetrit, Y., Banville, H., and King, J.-R.Brain decoding:
toward real-time reconstruction of visual perception.arXiv preprint
arXiv:2310.19812, 2023.
Bereska L, Gavves E.
2024. Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety: A Review. arXiv:2404.14082v2
M. M. Hasan,
M. U. Islam, and M. J. Sadeq, “Towards the technological adaptation of advanced
farming through artificial intelligence, the internet of things, and robotics:
A comprehensive overview,” Artificial Intelligence and Smart Agriculture
Technology, pp. 21–42, 2022.
C. Dwork, M.
Hardt, T. Pitassi, O. Reingold, and R. Zemel, “Fairness through awareness,” in
Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference,
2012, pp. 214–226. [12]
M. J.
Kusner, J. Loftus, C. Russell, and R. Silva, “Counterfactual fairness,”
Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
F. Xu, H.
Uszkoreit, Y. Du, W. Fan, D. Zhao, and J. Zhu, “Explainable ai: A brief survey
on history, research areas, approaches and challenges,” in Natural Language
Processing and Chinese Computing: 8th CCF International Conference, NLPCC 2019,
Dunhuang, China, October 9–14, 2019, Proceedings, Part II 8. Springer, 2019,
pp. 563–574.