Autism in Other Primates? Revisiting the Solitary Forager Hypothesis Fifteen Years Later

Abstract

Some male rhesus macaques consistently spend less time interacting with other monkeys, initiate fewer friendly contacts, and process social information differently. These animals were not genetically engineered or experimentally isolated to produce an autism model. Researchers identified them within existing social groups and subsequently found developmental, behavioral, familial, and neurochemical characteristics relevant to autism. Particularly striking are differences in social initiation, face recognition, and reciprocal signaling, together with preserved object recognition and an association with vasopressin. These findings provide an opportunity to revisit the solitary forager hypothesis, which proposed that some autism-associated traits might reflect variation in mammalian social organization and that related phenotypes could occur within other social species. This article reviews the rhesus evidence alongside findings in chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, voles, and other mammals. Several comparative expectations have received substantial support, including naturally occurring social variation and shared involvement of neuropeptide systems. Other propositions require refinement: social motivation, recognition, attachment, and nonsocial abilities are more separable than a single sociality continuum suggests. The central evolutionary prediction remains that particular combinations of these traits could support competence under reduced social dependence. The next step is to measure that competence directly and determine how its consequences change across environments.

Keywords: autism; solitary forager hypothesis; rhesus macaque; comparative neuroscience; social motivation; vasopressin; behavioral ecology

1. A Question Raised in 2011

In 2011, I proposed that some characteristics associated with autism might make more sense when considered in relation to the environments in which human cognition evolved. Persistent interests, repeated practice, attention to physical regularities, and a reduced need for frequent social reinforcement could conceivably have been useful when individuals obtained resources independently or worked within small, familiar groups. I called this the solitary forager hypothesis. Its central question was whether characteristics that interfere with modern social participation might have had different consequences under other ecological conditions. 

Conceptualizing_the_Autism_Spectrum_in_T.pdf

The hypothesis led to a comparative question. If some autism-associated traits involve variation in biological systems shared with other mammals, should related combinations occur elsewhere? Near the end of the original paper, I wrote:

“Perhaps populations of other social species, such as chimpanzees, have an equally low but consistent prevalence of autistic individuals as well.” 

Conceptualizing_the_Autism_Spectrum_in_T.pdf

The wording was exploratory. It proposed that a recognizable minority might occur within an otherwise social species, rather than only drawing comparisons between humans and species that normally live alone. I also suggested that the absence of suitable identification methods could obscure such animals:

“No formal diagnostic criteria are available for psychiatric or even social disabilities in other animals (Wilner, 1991), but it would be interesting, although difficult, to see if there are analogues, or possibly homologues of autism in other species.” 

Conceptualizing_the_Autism_Spectrum_in_T.pdf

The subsequent article, published online in 2013 and in print in 2014, developed the comparative approach more directly. It examined differences in affiliation, recognition, social reward, and neurochemical regulation across mammals. Importantly, it distinguished variation between species from variation among individuals within a species:

“Perhaps both intra- and interspecific diversity can be utilized to investigate the autism spectrum; however, the data concerning interspecific diversity is currently much stronger.” 

Solitary_Mammals_Provide_an_Animal_Model.pdf

Fifteen years after the first paper, the within-species comparison has become considerably more informative. The rhesus macaque literature now connects naturally occurring social differences with early development, recognition memory, family relationships, and a neurochemical system also implicated in human social difficulties. The result is more specific than the observation that some animals prefer less company.

There is also an important historical qualification. Chimpanzee social responsiveness was already being investigated with an autism-related instrument in 2011, the same year the solitary forager paper appeared. Comparative personality and vole neurobiology had still earlier foundations. The appropriate claim is therefore that later findings support and refine an explicit comparative expectation, not that the earlier papers originated the study of animal social variation.

2. What the Solitary Forager Hypothesis Proposed

The hypothesis begins with a distinction between social performance and practical competence. A hypothetical person might struggle to follow a rapid conversation while learning a complicated procedure through observation and repeated attempts. Another might have difficulty establishing rapport with strangers while retaining detailed knowledge of materials, locations, or recurring events. Whether such a profile becomes useful, disabling, or both depends partly on the activities through which that person must obtain resources and participate.

The original paper used orangutans to make this distinction tangible. An orangutan would be poorly suited to many expectations of a human classroom. That observation would reveal little about its ability to solve problems in a forest. The purpose of the comparison was to question whether performance under one social arrangement provides a universal measure of competence. It was not to equate an autistic person’s mind with that of another species. 

Conceptualizing_the_Autism_Spectrum_in_T.pdf

The proposed ancestral phenotype was not necessarily a person living entirely alone. The original account included individuals who foraged independently and periodically rejoined familiar companions. A preference for less frequent interaction could coexist with attachment, mating, learning from caregivers, and useful participation in a small group. 

Conceptualizing_the_Autism_Spectrum_in_T.pdf

The hypothesis also proposed a developmental mechanism. Activities with meaningful consequences could capture attention and organize repeated practice. Ordinary appetite, for example, might make another person’s resource-acquisition behavior worth observing. The learner would have a reason to study the action even when pleasing the demonstrator was not the main incentive. The broader proposition was that motivation and repeated experience could direct sustained interests toward useful knowledge. This remains a hypothesis about development, not evidence that hunger automatically produces proficiency. 

Conceptualizing_the_Autism_Spectrum_in_T.pdf

The two original papers consequently made related but distinguishable proposals. One concerned the possible ecological value of particular cognitive profiles. The other proposed studying naturally varying mammalian social systems to understand their mechanisms. The newer research bears more directly on the second, while making the first easier to test.

3. The Rhesus Macaques: A Social Difference Becomes a Research Program

From time alone to social initiation

The central rhesus studies concern animals living in large outdoor social groups at the California National Primate Research Center. Investigators recorded whether individuals were apart from others, nearby, in bodily contact, grooming, or playing. “Low-social” describes animals toward the less-interactive end of this distribution. It does not identify a separate species or establish that a fixed percentage of wild monkeys has an autism-like condition. 

Low-Social Rhesus Macaques and Autism Evolutionary Mismatch: Evidence for Subsistence-Reinforcement Coupling, Ecological Competence, and Context-Dependent Fitness

Researchers also adapted the human Social Responsiveness Scale to macaques. Talbot and colleagues’ 2020 study evaluated the instrument in 349 animals and produced a revised 17-item version whose scores predicted directly observed social behavior. This supplied a practical way to relate observations to a standardized set of autism-relevant social characteristics. A high score was not a human diagnosis, but neither was the comparison merely an impression that a monkey seemed unusually reserved.

The next question was what the animals were doing differently. Talbot and colleagues (2022) found that low-social males initiated fewer approaches, nonaggressive contacts, and grooming solicitations. They did not receive significantly less prosocial behavior during the observations or show more threat exchanges. Classification also remained informative when a subset was reassessed two years later. The difference therefore involved persistent variation in initiating friendly contact, rather than simply a temporary lack of opportunities to interact.

Even this pattern has more than one possible interpretation. Earlier work by Capitanio and colleagues distinguished low-sociable males that made tentative approaches without much sustained interaction from animals that showed little indication of seeking contact in the first place. The authors described these as putatively lonely and putatively introverted patterns. These labels were interpretations of behavior, but the distinction is important: wanting little contact and failing to obtain desired contact are different problems.

Differences visible early in life

The developmental evidence is especially interesting because investigators could examine infant assessments from animals later classified by their social behavior. Sclafani and colleagues (2016) studied 50 males and found differences in tests administered at approximately three to four months of age. Future low-social animals did not show the face-novelty preference observed in future high-social animals. They also averted their gaze less often during aggressive displays.

The gaze result deserves attention. It was not simply “less eye contact,” nor was it greater avoidance of every social stimulus. The difference concerned how looking behavior changed in response to a particular social situation. That is a more useful comparison with autism than assuming that the same outward gesture always has the same meaning across species.

In humans, face recognition itself varies substantially within autism. Minio-Paluello and colleagues (2020) identified pronounced face-memory difficulties in a subgroup of 80 autistic adults without intellectual disability. Performance was not explained by general intelligence or overall autism severity. Thus, face recognition can be examined as a particular capacity rather than used as a proxy for the person’s entire cognitive profile.

Vasopressin provides a biological connection

Parker and colleagues’ 2018 study supplied an important neurochemical result. Low-social male macaques had lower concentrations of vasopressin in cerebrospinal fluid, the fluid surrounding the brain and spinal cord. The finding replicated in another monkey cohort, while repeated sampling in an additional cohort showed relative stability within individuals. The investigators then reported lower concentrations in a small sample of autistic boys compared with male medical controls.

This was a direct cross-primate comparison involving the same molecule. Vasopressin is a signaling peptide with several physiological functions, including roles in mammalian social behavior. Its relevance here is not that it constitutes a universal measure of sociability, but that variation in it tracked particular social differences in both samples.

Oztan and colleagues (2021) extended the work beyond selected behavioral extremes. In a sample of 76 male macaques, cerebrospinal-fluid vasopressin was relatively stable and related to quantitative social-responsiveness scores. The association concerned variation across the sampled population, not only membership in a researcher-defined low-social group.

The human connection has continued. A 2026 study of neuropathological specimens and associated data from 18 individuals again related cerebrospinal-fluid vasopressin to autism-related social difficulties. In concurrently collected postmortem specimens, it also predicted hypothalamic vasopressin gene expression, whereas blood concentrations did not. That distinction strengthens the biological interpretation while cautioning against treating a peripheral hormone measurement as interchangeable with a central one.

Changing selected social functions

The intervention experiment added something the observational associations could not. Talbot and colleagues (2024) administered nebulized vasopressin or placebo to eight low-social males. Under placebo, the monkeys did not demonstrate the expected face-recognition memory, although object recognition was intact. Vasopressin improved face recognition and appropriate affiliative responding without changing object recognition or increasing measured aggression.

The medical and theoretical implication is specific. A stable social phenotype can contain functions that remain responsive to neuromodulation. The experiment did not establish superior nonsocial intelligence, but it demonstrated why social recognition and nonsocial recognition should be tested separately.

Family resemblance and sex

A pedigree analysis of 407 males found that paternal half-siblings resembled one another in social functioning more strongly than maternal half-siblings. The result appeared with observed nonsocial behavior and with social-responsiveness ratings. Fathers’ own behavioral phenotypes were not measured, so this is evidence of paternal-family structure rather than a direct demonstration that low-social fathers produced low-social sons (Garner et al., 2023).

This should also be distinguished from the association between older paternal age and autism in human population studies. Resemblance through paternal ancestry and an effect associated with the father’s age are different observations. Their possible mechanisms require separate investigation.

The male findings did not transfer straightforwardly to females. In 88 female macaques, dominance rank was particularly informative about social-responsiveness scores, while the male vasopressin relationship was not reproduced. This makes sex and social position part of the explanation; it does not establish a monkey equivalent of the human sex ratio in autism (Oztan et al., 2024).

What the monkeys actually share with autism research

The evidence is best understood as a constellation of measured components, rather than a complete human diagnostic syndrome.

Domain	Finding in the rhesus program	Significance of the comparison
Social initiation	Fewer self-initiated friendly approaches, contacts, and grooming solicitations	Separates spontaneous approach from opportunities supplied by others
Social engagement	More time apart and less affiliative activity	Identifies a quantitative behavioral difference without directly measuring subjective preference
Early social attention	Infant face-recognition and context-dependent gaze differences	Establishes a developmental social-information component
Recognition memory	Face recognition differed while object recognition remained intact in the intervention experiment	Demonstrates a specific social–nonsocial dissociation
Reciprocal signaling	Appropriate affiliative responding changed with vasopressin	Identifies a pharmacologically responsive social function
Repetitive behavior	Assessed in the broader rating research and partly separable from social motivation	Relevant variation, but not an established defining feature of the low-social group
Restricted interests and practical expertise	Not established in the defined low-social cohorts	Predictions requiring direct measurement

The final two rows prevent an important misunderstanding. The factor-analysis study identified Poor Social Motivation, Poor Social Attractiveness, and Inappropriate Behavior as distinguishable dimensions. Repetitive and disruptive behavior contributed to the last dimension, which did not predict the observed social-engagement measures. Questionnaire content therefore should not be converted into a claim that every low-social monkey has stereotypies or narrow interests.

Taken together, the rhesus findings support a substantial comparative resemblance. They also come largely from an interconnected research program with overlapping cohorts. Their strength is the depth of characterization, not the existence of many wholly independent population replications. 

Low-Social Rhesus Macaques and Autism Evolutionary Mismatch: Evidence for Subsistence-Reinforcement Coupling, Ecological Competence, and Context-Dependent Fitness

4. The Chimpanzees Were Being Studied Too

Chimpanzees deserve particular attention because I named them in the original prediction. A closer examination of the literature reveals that the comparison is more explicit than our initial review suggested.

Marrus and colleagues published a chimpanzee–human social-responsiveness measure in 2011. Their study included 29 chimpanzees and 20 human children, translating the human instrument for chimpanzees and then translating it back into a cross-species human version. Scores captured individual variation, and one chimpanzee already known for atypical social behavior scored substantially higher than others at its site. This was contemporaneous with the original solitary forager paper, not a later consequence of it.

The genetic findings add another dimension. Hopkins and colleagues (2014) investigated receptive joint attention, the ability to follow another individual’s attention toward something. Performance was partly heritable, and an association with variation near the vasopressin receptor gene appeared in males. Performance on a nonsocial cognitive task was not associated with the same genotype. This does not establish the full rhesus phenotype, but it again separates a social-information measure from a comparison cognitive measure.

Staes and colleagues (2015) subsequently associated chimpanzee sociability with variation near AVPR1A, but not with the examined oxytocin-receptor variant. AVPR1A encodes a receptor through which vasopressin acts; it is not the gene for the peptide itself. The study therefore points to naturally varying receptivity to a social signaling system.

There is also a useful correction to the earlier comparative account. Chimpanzees are not uniformly missing the relevant repeat-containing regulatory segment. They vary in whether they carry a segment called DupB, which contains the RS3 microsatellite. That within-species variation is precisely what makes association studies possible. The simple species contrast in the older paper should consequently be replaced with a population-genetic description.

Most directly, Weiss, Wilson, and Hopkins (2021) examined explicitly autism-related trait scores in 121 chimpanzees. The scores showed a moderate heritable component and were related to early rearing history. The main AVPR1A association was uncertain, and the genotype-by-rearing result did not follow the expected pattern. This supports the study of measurable autism-relevant variation, while resisting a simple account in which one deletion creates the phenotype.

These studies are more than a collection of anecdotes about unsociable chimpanzees. They show that investigators can measure social responsiveness, relate components to pedigrees and genetic variation, and examine developmental influences. They do not yet assemble social initiation, recognition, repetitive behavior, nonsocial learning, and ecological performance into the same integrated phenotype.

Rearing effects also need their own interpretation. An association with atypical captive experience cannot be assumed to represent adaptive preparation for solitude, and it does not establish a parental cause of human autism. Natural social disposition, developmental adversity, and their interaction are different explanatory possibilities.

5. Bonobos, Orangutans, and the Diversity of Primate Sociality

Bonobos are especially informative because the question concerns variation within a highly social ape. Staes and colleagues (2016) combined two years of direct observations from 46 bonobos with personality ratings from 154 animals and DNA from 113. Stable dimensions included Sociability, Boldness, Openness, and Activity. Their models yielded nonzero heritability estimates across the measured personality dimensions, although environmental and family circumstances influenced those estimates.

The AVPR1A result was more selective than a general “sociability gene” interpretation would suggest. The examined variation was associated with Attentiveness and behaviorally measured Openness, not the Sociability factor itself. This is evidence that related biological systems can contribute to different components of individuality rather than determining one unified social character.

Orangutans contribute a different kind of evidence. Their comparatively dispersed social organization was central to the original argument, but newer research gives a richer account of how independent competence develops. Schuppli and colleagues (2016) found that immature wild orangutans closely observed others during feeding and nest building, particularly for complex or unfamiliar activities. Observation was followed by selective practice. Independent foraging can therefore develop through substantial social learning.

That finding refines the original comparison. Reduced dependence on continuous association need not mean reduced dependence on every form of social information. An individual can learn a procedure from another and later perform it alone. The ecological question is how social learning, independent practice, and coordinated action are combined.

Comparative eye tracking further discourages a single scale from “social” to “not social.” Kano and colleagues (2018) studied bonobos, chimpanzees, orangutans, rhesus macaques, and humans viewing social scenes. Bonobos and rhesus macaques looked relatively more toward eyes, whereas chimpanzees and orangutans allocated relatively more attention to mouths. Experience also affected chimpanzee gaze patterns. Different attention patterns can reflect different uses of socially informative features.

Not every population yields an equally clear general sociability dimension. A 2024 study of 84 hamadryas and olive baboons combined extensive observation with several oxytocin and vasopressin measures. Many behaviors had low repeatability, and the investigators did not recover a clear generalized sociability structure. This is a substantive constraint: the rhesus pattern should be tested across species, not presumed universal (Coppeto et al., 2024).

The primate evidence consequently supports shared components more strongly than one identical syndrome. Affiliation, apprehension, recognition, attention, and behavioral persistence can combine differently. That is compatible with a comparative account of autism only if the corresponding human traits are also examined separately.

6. Returning to the Voles: How Social Behavior Can Be Retuned

The vole literature supplied much of the molecular foundation of the 2013/2014 paper. It showed why the amount and distribution of a receptor could matter as much as the presence of a signaling molecule. The original discussion also highlighted microsatellites, short repeated DNA sequences whose variation can influence gene regulation. 

Solitary_Mammals_Provide_an_Animal_Model.pdf

Hammock and Young’s 2005 experiments associated prairie-vole avpr1a repeat variation with differences in gene expression, receptor distribution, and social behavior. This work preceded my papers and helped motivate them. The suggestion was that regulatory variation could act somewhat like a tuning mechanism, altering how existing social circuits respond without requiring a new set of brain structures.

Human experiments provided a corresponding molecular possibility. Tansey and colleagues (2011) found that different AVPR1A promoter-repeat constructs produced different levels of activity in cultured cells. Their genetic associations with autism were weak, and the findings do not establish a single repeat-length rule for human sociality. They show why regulatory sequences deserve functional investigation rather than being dismissed as irrelevant DNA.

Later vole work connected regulation to ecological and reproductive outcomes. Okhovat and colleagues (2015) linked variation at avpr1a to receptor expression in spatial-memory-related regions, territorial behavior, sexual fidelity, and offspring paternity. Their population-genetic analyses supported selection maintaining regulatory diversity. The relevant architecture involved more than repeat length alone.

This is an important evolutionary precedent. Alternative neural configurations can participate in competing reproductive strategies rather than being arranged along a single scale of better and worse. It does not demonstrate the same selection history in humans, but it supplies a biological mechanism through which behavioral diversity can have context-dependent consequences.

Other vole studies clarify what “social” means. Beery and colleagues (2021) found that familiar-partner preferences and huddling could coexist with relatively little willingness to work for social access. Social preference, tolerance, and motivation were distinguishable. A nonmonogamous species should therefore not automatically be described as incapable of attachment or group living.

Development provides another comparison. In Syrian and Siberian hamsters, Beery, Lee, and Cooke (2025) documented substantial reorganization of oxytocin receptors across a dispersal-like transition. In Syrian hamsters, social interest and interaction generally declined with maturation, while play followed a different trajectory. The laboratory study did not isolate receptor change as the cause of dispersal, but it identified a neural correlate of increasing social independence in naturally solitary species.

Even domestication contributes a useful example. VonHoldt and colleagues (2017) associated canine human-directed hypersociability with variation in genes within the region implicated in human Williams-Beuren syndrome. Dogs do not thereby become a model of every feature of that syndrome, nor does Williams syndrome become the molecular opposite of autism. The finding demonstrates that genes implicated in human social-developmental phenotypes can also participate in evolved behavioral variation in another mammal.

Across these examples, the most consistent lesson concerns regulation. Social systems can vary in their sensitivity, developmental course, and relationship to particular activities. That is a stronger basis for comparison than treating a species as possessing either social cognition or its absence.

7. Returning to Humans: Which Autistic Characteristics Are Relevant?

The comparative evidence makes a blanket account of autism less appropriate, not more. The rhesus findings concern particular social functions. They do not explain every instance of intellectual disability, language impairment, sensory difficulty, regression, or repetitive behavior accompanying an autism diagnosis.

The later original paper anticipated this limitation:

“The modern, nosological entity of autism is a mixture of phenotypes with separate causes lumped together by clinicians.” 

Solitary_Mammals_Provide_an_Animal_Model.pdf

Current research provides more precise ways to study those combinations. Chetcuti and colleagues (2025) separated social reticence, seeking, and maintenance of interaction in 509 autistic young people. They identified engaged, inhibited, aloof, and avoidant profiles. Someone with pronounced apprehension but relatively preserved interaction maintenance differs from someone who seeks little contact without comparable reticence. These are research profiles, not new diagnoses.

The low-social macaque comparison is most directly relevant to reduced spontaneous initiation and selected social-processing differences. It should not be used to assume that all autistic people want little company. Li and Shum’s 2026 study found lower orientation toward and effort for the tested social rewards in its autistic sample, while many participants nevertheless valued friendship and preferred small, stable networks and shared activities.

The nonsocial side also needs separate measurement. Warrier and colleagues (2019), studying 51,564 people, found that systemizing was heritable and genetically related to autism. Systemizing polygenic scores predicted restricted/repetitive behavior but not social difficulties in autistic participants. A strong drive to analyze systems is therefore not simply the automatic consequence of low social motivation.

This suggests a more precise version of the ecological hypothesis. Particular combinations of reduced affiliative motivation, sustained engagement, learning ability, and tolerance for independent activity may have distinctive consequences. The combination must be demonstrated rather than assumed from diagnosis.

The original suggestion that selection might have acted on subclinical traits remains relevant here. However, neither subclinical status nor an apparently ordinary family history proves adaptation. The question is whether the measured traits predict performance and costs under different circumstances, and whether the contributing biological variation has an evolutionary history consistent with those effects. 

Conceptualizing_the_Autism_Spectrum_in_T.pdf

8. Competence, Social Circumstances, and Ecological Costs

An especially instructive rhesus experiment concerns animals that were low-ranking rather than low-social. Drea and Wallen (1999) found that subordinate monkeys appeared to perform poorly on food-related associations when tested with dominant animals. When the social groups were separated, they immediately displayed knowledge already acquired. The social setting affected the expression of learning, not simply whether learning had occurred.

The human parallel is a question about assessment. A person may understand a procedure but struggle to explain their suitability to an unfamiliar interviewer. Maras and colleagues (2021) found that more explicit, structured interview questions improved answer quality particularly for autistic participants. The study altered the route through which competence was presented rather than the participants’ underlying occupational skills.

These findings support examining competence-access mismatch: a discrepancy between performing a useful activity and satisfying the conditions required to gain access to it. They do not establish that ancestral communities were uniformly accepting or that modern occupations are uniformly unsuitable. They identify environmental variables that can be changed and tested.

The ancestral proposal remains that some developmental settings connected meaningful outcomes, demonstration, and practice more directly. A youngster might become interested in another person’s actions because those actions reliably accomplished something valuable. The relevant modern implication is to investigate accessible routes to learning, not to recreate deprivation or assume that necessity supplies missing skills. 

Conceptualizing_the_Autism_Spectrum_in_T.pdf

Ecological costs are equally important. Myers and colleagues (2021) found more traumatic injury events among 73 low-social than 79 high-social male macaques. Equal threat rates during sampled observations did not imply equal accumulated risk. The phenotype may involve costs in conflict recognition, avoidance, partner support, or other processes that the medical records alone could not resolve.

A study on Cayo Santiago demonstrates that the value of a social characteristic can change with the environment. After Hurricane Maria reduced vegetation and shade, greater social tolerance helped monkeys share shaded areas and predicted survival. Before the hurricane, the same relationship with survival was not apparent. In this case, ecological disruption increased the benefit of tolerance, not of low sociality (Testard et al., 2024).

These observations establish a tradeoff framework without supplying the desired result in advance. The defined low-social male phenotype has not yet been shown to achieve greater reproductive success under a particular ecology. Its frequency and familial structure cannot substitute for that measurement.

There is also direct evidence against a generalized autistic foraging advantage. Pellicano and colleagues (2011) found less systematic and less efficient large-scale search in autistic children performing a laboratory foraging task. The result does not measure every possible subsistence skill, but it rules out treating focused interests or perceptual differences as sufficient evidence of broadly superior search.

9. What Has Aged Well, and What Has Changed?

The strongest development is the movement from a broad animal analogy toward measured, multilevel comparisons. Naturally varying social behavior can now be connected to early processing, family relationships, regulatory genetics, and experimental changes in particular functions. The evidence is strongest for the comparative approach and the separability of social processes.

Some early formulations need revision. An account built around uniformly low oxytocin is less useful than one examining regional signaling. Freeman and colleagues’ postmortem study found lower oxytocin-receptor binding in the ventral pallidum but higher binding in the nucleus basalis of Meynert in autism specimens. A receptor system can differ in its organization without being globally deficient.

Likewise, the complete hypothesis should no longer assume that social motivation, attachment, recognition, and systemizing move together. The evidence favors partially separable dimensions. This does not remove the possibility of a recurring ecological configuration; it specifies what researchers must demonstrate.

How the original proposals fare

Original proposal	Current assessment
Naturally occurring autism-relevant variation should be found within other social species.	Supported for several component traits, most comprehensively characterized in the rhesus program and explicitly studied in chimpanzees.
Comparing mammalian social systems should identify mechanisms relevant to autism.	Supported by converging vasopressin, receptor-regulation, and social-processing research.
Social difficulty need not imply equivalent impairment in every cognitive domain.	Supported by specific dissociations, including face versus object recognition; broad practical competence remains to be measured.
Sociality should be investigated as quantitative population variation.	Supported, although multiple dimensions are more informative than one master continuum.
Some early global neurochemical and species contrasts would prove accurate.	Mixed. Regional receptor findings, chimpanzee regulatory variation, and context-dependent signaling require revisions.
Reduced affiliation should sometimes coexist with ecological competence or advantage.	The central unresolved prediction. Neither competence nor fitness advantage follows from low sociality alone.
Comparative findings could inform intervention.	Supported as a target-discovery strategy; a modifiable monkey function does not by itself establish effective human treatment.

The therapeutic implication is to ask whether recognition, communication, anxiety, or access to learning can be improved selectively while preserving abilities and preferences the person values. The evolutionary explanation may guide the search, but clinical benefit must be established independently.

The more general implication is that neither a social questionnaire nor a diagnosis should stand in for a complete account of an individual. The same outward withdrawal can have different causes, and the same biological variation can have different consequences in different settings.

10. The Experiment That Should Come Next

The decisive next study would identify social profiles before measuring success at practical tasks. A large, unselected primate population could be observed repeatedly for initiation, receipt of affiliation, response to approaches, and signs of apprehension. Researchers would then assess those same animals on recognition, independent learning, persistence, spatial knowledge, and realistic problem-solving activities.

The crucial manipulation would concern where useful information comes from. In one condition, an animal would acquire it through exploration and sustained manipulation. In another, equivalent information would be available through observing or coordinating with a partner. A mixed condition would permit independent work with occasional exchange.

The hypothesis predicts more than a difference in overall task performance. It predicts that particular social profiles respond differently to those arrangements. A relatively low-initiating animal might perform competently when sustained independent activity is useful but benefit less from rapid interpersonal information exchange. Alternatively, no such pattern may appear. Either result would substantially clarify the theory.

Full activity budgets would be essential. Time away from companions could be spent investigating resources, practicing a procedure, resting, monitoring threats, or engaging in unproductive repetition. The existing label “nonsocial” does not determine which alternative occurs. Ecological interpretation requires observing the replacement activity. 

Low-Social Rhesus Macaques and Autism Evolutionary Mismatch: Evidence for Subsistence-Reinforcement Coupling, Ecological Competence, and Context-Dependent Fitness

The same logic applies to human research. Social motivation and systemizing should be measured separately, then tested against learning and participation under different conditions. Selecting only skilled, low-social individuals would make the hypothesis circular. The relevant question is whether the traits predict outcomes in a prospectively defined sample.

A further comparison should distinguish independent competence from specialization within a cooperative group. If sustained interests mainly benefit a group through division of labor, that would favor a cooperative-specialist account. If reduced social dependence independently predicts success when individual resource acquisition is required, the solitary-forager interpretation would gain more specific support.

Finally, practical performance must be connected to fitness-relevant outcomes rather than assumed to represent them. Survival, injury, partner relationships, offspring production, and offspring survival can point in different directions. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether an apparent benefit outweighs its costs and whether that balance changes with ecology.

11. Conclusion

The most important change since the original papers is that autism-relevant variation in other primates is no longer only a general comparative possibility. Researchers have measured it, followed aspects of its development, connected it to familial and neurochemical variation, and experimentally altered selected social functions. The rhesus macaque program provides the clearest accumulated example, while chimpanzee and bonobo studies show that several of its important components occur in other apes.

The solitary forager hypothesis has therefore gained support for its comparative foundation while becoming more specific about what remains to be explained. It should concern combinations of motivation, recognition, persistence, learning, and environmental demands, not an assertion that autism as a whole is one adaptation.

The question that first motivated the hypothesis remains worth asking: under what circumstances can an individual rely less on frequent social interaction and still learn effectively, contribute, and reproduce? The newer studies give us better ways to identify the relevant individuals and investigate the mechanisms. The next step is to discover what those individuals do with their independence.

References

Beery, A. K., Lee, N. S., & Cooke, E. M. (2025). Declines in oxytocin receptor density and social behavior across a dispersal-like transition in solitary hamsters. Developmental Neurobiology, 85, e23005. DOI: 10.1002/dneu.23005.

Beery, A. K., Lopez, S. A., Blandino, K. L., Lee, N. S., & Bourdon, N. S. (2021). Social selectivity and social motivation in voles. eLife, 10, e72684. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72684.

Capitanio, J. P., Hawkley, L. C., Cole, S. W., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2014). A behavioral taxonomy of loneliness in humans and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). PLOS ONE, 9, e110307. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110307.

Chetcuti, L., et al. (2025). Parsing the heterogeneity of social motivation in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 66, 1376–1389. DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.14147.

Coppeto, M., et al. (2024). Peptides and primate personality: Central and peripheral oxytocin and vasopressin levels and social behavior in two baboon species (Papio hamadryas and Papio anubis). Peptides, 179, 171270. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171270.

Drea, C. M., & Wallen, K. (1999). Low-status monkeys “play dumb” when learning in mixed social groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 12965–12969. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12965.

Freeman, S. M., et al. (2018). Effect of age and autism spectrum disorder on oxytocin receptor density in the human basal forebrain and midbrain. Translational Psychiatry, 8, 257. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-018-0315-3.

Garner, J. P., et al. (2023). Rhesus macaque social functioning is paternally, but not maternally, inherited by sons: Potential implications for autism. Molecular Autism, 14, 25. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-023-00556-3.

Hammock, E. A. D., & Young, L. J. (2005). Microsatellite instability generates diversity in brain and sociobehavioral traits. Science, 308, 1630–1634. DOI: 10.1126/science.1111427.

Hopkins, W. D., et al. (2014). Genetic influences on receptive joint attention in chimpanzees. Scientific Reports, 4, 3774. DOI: 10.1038/srep03774.

Kano, F., Shepherd, S. V., Hirata, S., & Call, J. (2018). Primate social attention: Species differences and effects of individual experience in humans, great apes, and macaques. PLOS ONE, 13, e0193283. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193283.

Li, J., & Shum, K. K. (2026). Social motivation in autism spectrum disorder: A mixed-methods exploration using eye-tracking, behavioral tasks, self- and parent-reports, and qualitative insights. Autism. DOI: 10.1177/13623613261445631.

Maras, K., et al. (2021). Ameliorating the disadvantage for autistic job seekers: An initial evaluation of adapted employment interview questions. Autism, 25, 1060–1075. DOI: 10.1177/1362361320981319.

Marrus, N., et al. (2011). Initial description of a quantitative, cross-species (chimpanzee–human) social responsiveness measure. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 508–518. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.01.009.

Minio-Paluello, I., Porciello, G., Pascual-Leone, A., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2020). Face individual identity recognition: A potential endophenotype in autism. Molecular Autism, 11, 81. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-020-00371-0.

Myers, A. K., et al. (2021). Assessment of medical morbidities in a rhesus monkey model of naturally occurring low sociality. Autism Research, 14, 1332–1346. DOI: 10.1002/aur.2512.

Okhovat, M., Berrio, A., Wallace, G., Ophir, A. G., & Phelps, S. M. (2015). Sexual fidelity trade-offs promote regulatory variation in the prairie vole brain. Science, 350, 1371–1374. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac5791.

Oztan, O., et al. (2021). Autism-associated biomarkers: Test–retest reliability and relationship to quantitative social trait variation in rhesus monkeys. Molecular Autism, 12, 50. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-021-00442-w.

Oztan, O., et al. (2024). Naturally occurring low sociality in female rhesus monkeys: A tractable model for autism or not? Molecular Autism, 15, 8. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-024-00588-3.

Oztan, O., et al. (2026). Cerebrospinal fluid vasopressin concentration is a biomarker of autistic social impairment and hypothalamic vasopressin gene expression in humans. Autism Research, 19, e70181. DOI: 10.1002/aur.70181.

Parker, K. J., et al. (2018). Arginine vasopressin in cerebrospinal fluid is a marker of sociality in nonhuman primates. Science Translational Medicine, 10, eaam9100. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam9100.

Pellicano, E., et al. (2011). Children with autism are neither systematic nor optimal foragers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 421–426. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014076108.

Reser, J. E. (2011). Conceptualizing the autism spectrum in terms of natural selection and behavioral ecology: The solitary forager hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 207–238. DOI: 10.1177/147470491100900209.

Reser, J. E. (2014). Solitary mammals provide an animal model for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 99–113. First published online November 4, 2013. DOI: 10.1037/a0034519.

Sandin, S., et al. (2016). Autism risk associated with parental age and with increasing difference in age between the parents. Molecular Psychiatry, 21, 693–700. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2015.70.

Schuppli, C., et al. (2016). Observational social learning and socially induced practice of routine skills in immature wild orang-utans. Animal Behaviour, 119, 87–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.06.014.

Sclafani, V., et al. (2016). Early predictors of impaired social functioning in male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). PLOS ONE, 11, e0165401. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165401.

Staes, N., et al. (2015). Chimpanzee sociability is associated with vasopressin (Avpr1a) but not oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) variation. Hormones and Behavior, 75, 84–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.08.006.

Staes, N., et al. (2016). Bonobo personality traits are heritable and associated with vasopressin receptor gene 1a variation. Scientific Reports, 6, 38193. DOI: 10.1038/srep38193.

Talbot, C. F., et al. (2020). A psychometrically robust screening tool to rapidly identify socially impaired monkeys in the general population. Autism Research, 13, 1465–1475. DOI: 10.1002/aur.2335.

Talbot, C. F., et al. (2021). The factor structure of the macaque social responsiveness scale-revised predicts social behavior and personality dimensions. American Journal of Primatology, 83, e23234. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23234.

Talbot, C. F., et al. (2022). Rhesus monkey sociality is stable across time and linked to variation in the initiation but not receipt of prosocial behavior. American Journal of Primatology, 84, e23442. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23442.

Talbot, C. F., et al. (2024). Nebulized vasopressin penetrates CSF and improves social cognition without inducing aggression in a rhesus monkey model of autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121, e2418635121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2418635121.

Tansey, K. E., et al. (2011). Functionality of promoter microsatellites of arginine vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1A): Implications for autism. Molecular Autism, 2, 3. DOI: 10.1186/2040-2392-2-3.

Testard, C., et al. (2024). Ecological disturbance alters the adaptive benefits of social ties. Science, 384, 1330–1335. DOI: 10.1126/science.adk0606.

vonHoldt, B. M., et al. (2017). Structural variants in genes associated with human Williams-Beuren syndrome underlie stereotypical hypersociability in domestic dogs. Science Advances, 3, e1700398. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700398.

Warrier, V., et al. (2019). Social and non-social autism symptoms and trait domains are genetically dissociable. Communications Biology, 2, 328. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0558-4.

Weiss, A., Wilson, V. A. D., & Hopkins, W. D. (2021). Early social rearing, the V1A arginine vasopressin receptor genotype, and autistic traits in chimpanzees. Autism Research, 14, 1843–1853. DOI: 10.1002/aur.2550.